Context matters regarding Mission Critical dialogue
Recent social media discussion about the Mission Critical Site south of Aurora stirred up a familiar mix of questions, concerns, and unfortunately, some inaccurate assumptions. This is not unusual with a project of this scale, but it is a good reminder that context matters, especially when evaluating long-term community investments.
For those who have followed coverage in the Aurora News-Register over the years, much of the information currently being discussed is not new. The Mission Critical site, owned by the Aurora Development Corporation since 2010, has always been positioned as a strategic effort to grow Aurora’s tax base and support future development. That vision has not changed.
Today, the 155-acre site has already brought in multiple employers, including Mid-Nebraska Land Developers, Specialty Ag Formulations and Fortitude Mining. With roughly 80 acres still available, the site continues to represent opportunity.
Take electricity usage, for example. It’s true that data centers, like the one owned by Fortitude Mining at the site, require significant power. In this case, that power is supplied by Southern Public Power District. Prior to development, the system was studied, capacity was confirmed, and the facility operates under an interruptible agreement that allows demand to be reduced during peak periods, like irrigation season. That’s not a burden on the community or the utility, instead it is a managed partnership that stabilizes electrical usage year-round.
Similarly, the conversation around public investment deserves a clearer lens. While a $5.2 million city bond has been referenced in recent public discussions, only a portion, about $670,000, was used to extend water and sewer infrastructure to the Mission Critical site. The majority of the $2.3 million total infrastructure cost was covered through other means, including private investment and state grant funding. Even more important is the return: a single project, the $22 million investment by Specialty Ag Formulations, is projected to repay the city’s portion through property taxes within five years. That’s the kind of outcome communities hope for when they invest in growth, not to mention the new customers purchasing water and sewer services.
None of this is to suggest that questions shouldn’t be asked. They should be. Transparency and accountability are essential in any community project. But those conversations are most productive when grounded in accurate information. This is something readers of the Aurora News-Register are lucky to have access to with a local newspaper.
Mission Critical was never about quick wins. It was, and still is, about thoughtful, long-term investment in Aurora’s future. As the remaining acres are developed and additional businesses consider the site, the community has an opportunity to stay focused on what matters most: sustainable growth, responsible planning, and a stronger local economy for the next generation.
KELSEY BERGEN serves as executive director of the Aurora Development Corporation. She can be reached at kelsey@growaurora.com